top of page

Get in touch with me

Tel: +972-544284240

Email: Knowing.mindfulness@gmail.com

INSTAGRAM

Sigue a @knowing.yoga.philosophy

The different names of Krishna often point to a quality, or add another layer of meaning to the verse.

🍃Bhagavad Gita 1.14, Krishna is called Madhava.
Madhava means “the husband of Lakshmi,” the goddess of prosperity. Some commentators see this as a subtle reminder that prosperity and righteousness are on the side of the Pandavas.

🍃Hrishikesha (1.15)
Hrishikesha means “Lord of the senses.”
As Krishna blows his conch at the beginning of the battle, the name highlights his mastery and inner steadiness even when the battle (such a horrific and big scene) is about to start.

🍃Achyuta (1.21)
Achyuta means “the infallible one” or “the one who never falls from his true nature.”
As Arjuna asks Krishna to place the chariot between the two armies, he addresses him as the one whose wisdom remains unwavering.

🍃Govinda (1.32)
Govinda means “giver of joy/he who gives pleasure to the senses.”
Here, Arjuna speaks emotionally about his family and suffering, There is irony here because Arjuna is speaking to the source of lasting fulfillment while lamenting the loss of worldly sources of fulfillment.

🍃Madhusudana (2.1)
Madhusudana means “slayer of the demon Madhu.”
Just as Krishna defeated the demon Madhu, some commentators see a symbolic meaning here: Krishna is about to destroy the confusion and doubt that have taken hold of Arjuna’s mind.

😱🔮The more I study these texts, the more I realize that even a single word can contain an entire teaching.

May this post help make these teachings a little more accessible. 🙏

The different names of Krishna often point to a quality, or add another layer of meaning to the verse.

🍃Bhagavad Gita 1.14, Krishna is called Madhava.
Madhava means “the husband of Lakshmi,” the goddess of prosperity. Some commentators see this as a subtle reminder that prosperity and righteousness are on the side of the Pandavas.

🍃Hrishikesha (1.15)
Hrishikesha means “Lord of the senses.”
As Krishna blows his conch at the beginning of the battle, the name highlights his mastery and inner steadiness even when the battle (such a horrific and big scene) is about to start.

🍃Achyuta (1.21)
Achyuta means “the infallible one” or “the one who never falls from his true nature.”
As Arjuna asks Krishna to place the chariot between the two armies, he addresses him as the one whose wisdom remains unwavering.

🍃Govinda (1.32)
Govinda means “giver of joy/he who gives pleasure to the senses.”
Here, Arjuna speaks emotionally about his family and suffering, There is irony here because Arjuna is speaking to the source of lasting fulfillment while lamenting the loss of worldly sources of fulfillment.

🍃Madhusudana (2.1)
Madhusudana means “slayer of the demon Madhu.”
Just as Krishna defeated the demon Madhu, some commentators see a symbolic meaning here: Krishna is about to destroy the confusion and doubt that have taken hold of Arjuna’s mind.

😱🔮The more I study these texts, the more I realize that even a single word can contain an entire teaching.

May this post help make these teachings a little more accessible. 🙏

One thing I love about these texts is that even a single name can open an entire discussion.

Whether we read Madhu as a mythological demon or as a symbol of the forces that cloud the mind, the question remains the same:
What is preventing us from seeing clearly?

May this post help make these teachings a little more accessible. 🙏

One thing I love about these texts is that even a single name can open an entire discussion.

Whether we read Madhu as a mythological demon or as a symbol of the forces that cloud the mind, the question remains the same:
What is preventing us from seeing clearly?

May this post help make these teachings a little more accessible. 🙏

At first glance, Arjuna seems to be doing the moral thing:

He doesn’t want to fight,
He doesn’t want to kill,
He doesn’t want to rule a kingdom at the cost of his family’s lives 🫅🏻

Most of us would probably agree with him, right?

But the Bhagavad Gita is about to teach something deeper:

The problem is not that Arjuna cares about his family. The question is whether his decision is coming from wisdom or from attachment and fear.

One of the most radical teachings of this text is that it doesn’t judge actions only by how they look from the outside, because the same action can come from fear or from clarity,
from attachment or from wisdom.

Arjuna wants to avoid battle, but from selfish reasons, so that action is not Yogi in this case.

The lesson is not only to look at what we do,
But learn the state of mind from which we act 🧠🤍

The full verses:

न काङ्क्षे विजयं कृष्ण न च राज्यं सुखानि च ।
किं नो राज्येन गोविन्द किं भोगैर्जीवितेन वा ॥ 32॥
येषामर्थे काङ्क्षितं नो राज्यं भोगा: सुखानि च ।
त इमेऽवस्थिता युद्धे प्राणांस्त्यक्त्वा धनानि च ॥ 33॥

“O Krishna, I do not desire victory, nor kingdom, nor pleasures. O Govinda, what is kingdom to us, what are enjoyments or even life? Those for whose sake we desired kingdom, enjoyments, and pleasures are standing here in battle, giving up their lives and wealth”.

May this post help make these teachings a little more accessible. 🙏

At first glance, Arjuna seems to be doing the moral thing:

He doesn’t want to fight,
He doesn’t want to kill,
He doesn’t want to rule a kingdom at the cost of his family’s lives 🫅🏻

Most of us would probably agree with him, right?

But the Bhagavad Gita is about to teach something deeper:

The problem is not that Arjuna cares about his family. The question is whether his decision is coming from wisdom or from attachment and fear.

One of the most radical teachings of this text is that it doesn’t judge actions only by how they look from the outside, because the same action can come from fear or from clarity,
from attachment or from wisdom.

Arjuna wants to avoid battle, but from selfish reasons, so that action is not Yogi in this case.

The lesson is not only to look at what we do,
But learn the state of mind from which we act 🧠🤍

The full verses:

न काङ्क्षे विजयं कृष्ण न च राज्यं सुखानि च ।
किं नो राज्येन गोविन्द किं भोगैर्जीवितेन वा ॥ 32॥
येषामर्थे काङ्क्षितं नो राज्यं भोगा: सुखानि च ।
त इमेऽवस्थिता युद्धे प्राणांस्त्यक्त्वा धनानि च ॥ 33॥

“O Krishna, I do not desire victory, nor kingdom, nor pleasures. O Govinda, what is kingdom to us, what are enjoyments or even life? Those for whose sake we desired kingdom, enjoyments, and pleasures are standing here in battle, giving up their lives and wealth”.

May this post help make these teachings a little more accessible. 🙏

Verse 1.32,33 of the Bhagavad Gita:

न काङ्क्षे विजयं कृष्ण न च राज्यं सुखानि च |
किं नो राज्येन गोविन्द किं भोगैर्जीवितेन वा || 32||

येषामर्थे काङ्क्षितं नो राज्यं भोगा: सुखानि च |
त इमेऽवस्थिता युद्धे प्राणांस्त्यक्त्वा धनानि च || 33||

“O Krishna, I do not desire victory, nor kingdom, nor pleasures. O Govinda, what is kingdom to us, what are enjoyments or even life? Those for whose sake we desired kingdom, enjoyments, and pleasures are standing here in battle, giving up their lives and wealth.”

May this post be for the benefit to all 🙏

Verse 1.32,33 of the Bhagavad Gita:

न काङ्क्षे विजयं कृष्ण न च राज्यं सुखानि च |
किं नो राज्येन गोविन्द किं भोगैर्जीवितेन वा || 32||

येषामर्थे काङ्क्षितं नो राज्यं भोगा: सुखानि च |
त इमेऽवस्थिता युद्धे प्राणांस्त्यक्त्वा धनानि च || 33||

“O Krishna, I do not desire victory, nor kingdom, nor pleasures. O Govinda, what is kingdom to us, what are enjoyments or even life? Those for whose sake we desired kingdom, enjoyments, and pleasures are standing here in battle, giving up their lives and wealth.”

May this post be for the benefit to all 🙏

Post a day about the verses and their deep meaning 🙏

Post a day about the verses and their deep meaning 🙏

What if fear is not always obvious?
Sometimes it sounds logical
Sometimes it sounds moral
Sometimes it even sounds compassionate.

One of the most fascinating questions in the Bhagavad Gita is not whether Arjuna is right or wrong; It’s where his reasoning is coming from

May this post help make these teachings a little more accessible🙏

What if fear is not always obvious?
Sometimes it sounds logical
Sometimes it sounds moral
Sometimes it even sounds compassionate.

One of the most fascinating questions in the Bhagavad Gita is not whether Arjuna is right or wrong; It’s where his reasoning is coming from

May this post help make these teachings a little more accessible🙏

May these words find whoever need them most now 🙏

May these words find whoever need them most now 🙏

The Bhagavad Gita can be read as a story taking place within our own minds🧠:

🍃There is the side of us that is completely identified with attachment and unable to see clearly (Dhitarashtra)

🍃The part of us that knows, has learned and walked the path (Krishna).

🍃And the part of us that still struggles with fear, confusion and attachment sometimes, although the right knowledge is also present (Arjuna).

The battlefield isn’t a physical place only, but a moment we’re pulled between wisdom and our old habits.

May this post help make these teachings a little more accessible 🙏

The Bhagavad Gita can be read as a story taking place within our own minds🧠:

🍃There is the side of us that is completely identified with attachment and unable to see clearly (Dhitarashtra)

🍃The part of us that knows, has learned and walked the path (Krishna).

🍃And the part of us that still struggles with fear, confusion and attachment sometimes, although the right knowledge is also present (Arjuna).

The battlefield isn’t a physical place only, but a moment we’re pulled between wisdom and our old habits.

May this post help make these teachings a little more accessible 🙏

.pro-gallery-wix-wrapper {display: block !important;} .pro-gallery-wix-wrapper .gallery-item-container {opacity: 1 !important; display: block !important;}

bottom of page